For more than three decades, I have listened to people in the offsite construction industry debate why modular construction hasn't grown faster. Some believe we have never developed a strong enough message. Others say the public still confuses modular homes with manufactured housing. Some people still assume anything built in a factory must be cheaply made, while others expect modular construction to cost substantially less simply because it happens indoors.
Now I am hearing renewed talk that what the industry really needs is a catchy motto and a powerful 30-second commercial. If we could just find the right words, show a few modules being lifted by a crane and add some inspiring music, perhaps buyers and developers would finally understand what we have been trying to tell them.
I wish it were that simple.
A clever slogan might generate attention, and a polished commercial could spark curiosity, but neither addresses the real obstacles holding modular construction back. After watching this industry for more than 30 years, I believe we are still trying to solve operational and credibility problems with marketing.
Successful Factories Are Already Telling Us Something
Some modular factories are doing quite well. Their production schedules are full, their customers return with additional projects, and they have developed reputations for delivering what they promise. Other factories continue to flounder, struggle to produce acceptable profits, and wait for the market to discover them.
That difference cannot be explained by the absence of a national industry motto. Every factory operates under the same general public perception of modular construction, yet some stay busy while others cannot find enough profitable work.
The successful factories usually have clearly defined markets, dependable builder and developer relationships, disciplined production systems, and products that match their capabilities. They understand what they can build efficiently, where they can deliver it, and which customers are most likely to appreciate what they offer.
The struggling factories often expect the word “modular” to do too much of the selling. They promote the construction method without clearly explaining why that method produces a better result for a particular customer.
Stop Trying to Sell the Word “Modular”
Most homebuyers do not wake up in the morning hoping to purchase a modular home. Developers don't start searching for modules just because they want to experiment with another construction method.
They want a home or building delivered on schedule, at a predictable cost and with fewer surprises. They want dependable quality, fewer change orders, less weather exposure and confidence that the people involved can complete the project.
For years, our industry has tried to tell people that modular is another way to build. I believe the stronger message is that modular offers a more controlled way to deliver the building they need.
That is an important distinction. One describes a construction method. The other promises a business or consumer outcome.
Manufactured housing has its own regulations, economics, products, and customers. Conventional site construction has its own traditions and processes. Modular construction should not spend another decade apologetically explaining that it is neither. It should demonstrate where and when its controlled process delivers measurable advantages.
We Have Worn Out the Adjectives
The modular industry loves certain words. We continually describe our buildings as faster, better, greener, safer, and more affordable. We have repeated those claims so many times that many buyers no longer hear them.
If we want people to believe modular construction is better, we must begin replacing adjectives with numbers.
Factories and their builder or developer partners should document the time between contract and occupancy, factory production schedules, weather days avoided, change orders, warranty claims, material waste, labor hours, jobsite disruption, energy performance, and final costs. Developers should be able to compare those results with their previous conventionally built projects.
Not every modular project will outperform site construction in every category. The industry weakens its credibility when it implies that modular construction is automatically faster, cheaper or better.
Modular becomes better when the project fits manufacturing and the factory, developer, builder, transportation company, set crew, and site contractor are properly aligned. When any one of those pieces is missing, the benefits can quickly disappear.
Admitting that would not hurt the industry. In fact, a little more honesty about when modular works and when it does not could become one of our strongest selling points.
Let Completed Projects Become the Advertising
A well-documented case study is worth far more than another commercial showing modules swinging from a crane. The crane set may be exciting to watch, but it tells us almost nothing about whether the project was profitable, completed on schedule or satisfactory to the owner.
Imagine showing a prospective developer the original schedule for a completed multifamily project, the actual completion date, the number of change orders, the factory quality records and the final comments from the owner, architect, general contractor and residents. That would be far more persuasive than hearing someone announce that modular construction is the future.
We need a coordinated collection of verified projects covering single-family housing, apartments, hotels, student housing, healthcare, senior living, workforce housing, affordable housing and disaster recovery. Adjust the message for each market because each customer is trying to solve a different problem.
A homeowner wants comfort, attractive design, quality and confidence. A developer is concerned about schedules, capital exposure, repeatability and return on investment. A municipality wants more housing, fewer neighborhood disruptions, code compliance and confidence that the project will actually be completed.
One slogan cannot speak effectively to all of them.
We Should Let Customers Speak for Us
The modular industry has spent decades talking about itself. Factory owners, consultants, trade associations and equipment suppliers keep explaining why modular construction deserves to grow.
The market would rather hear from people who have already taken the risk.
If the industry truly wants a powerful 30-second commercial, it should feature a developer explaining that a modular project opened four months earlier than the company’s previous conventionally built project, avoided most weather delays and experienced fewer change orders. A homeowner could describe the comfort, quality and buying experience. A city official could explain how modular helped deliver needed housing without years of neighborhood disruption.
Those are not promotional claims dreamed up in a conference room. They are customer experiences supported by actual results.
Homeowners, developers, lenders, architects, inspectors and general contractors should become the voices of modular construction. Their experiences carry more credibility than anything the industry can say about itself.
Fix the Customer Experience Before Inviting More People Inside
A national promotional campaign could create a problem few people are discussing. What happens if the campaign succeeds?
Suppose thousands of prospective buyers and developers suddenly become interested in modular construction. They contact factories but receive no response for weeks. They ask for pricing but get vague estimates that keep changing. They cannot find a qualified local builder, and no one clearly explains what is included in the factory contract or who is responsible for the site work.
Instead of improving modular’s reputation, the campaign could confirm every concern the public already has.
Before inviting more people through the front door, the industry must improve what happens after they arrive. Factories need faster and more professional responses to inquiries, realistic preliminary pricing, honest production schedules, clear scopes of responsibility, qualified regional partners and dependable warranty procedures.
Marketing cannot overcome a fragmented and unreliable customer experience. It can only deliver more people to it.
Build Demonstration Markets Instead of a National Campaign
Rather than spending heavily on a broad national awareness campaign, I would begin by selecting regional markets where modular construction can solve a visible housing problem.
Bring together the right factory, developer, lender, municipality, general contractor, transporter, and set crew. Complete several projects, measure the results carefully, and publish what can be verified. Then use what was learned to repeat the model in another market.
Modular construction is more likely to grow through successful regional clusters than through an attempt to make the entire country fall in love with the word “modular.” The goal should be to develop markets where lenders understand the process, officials know how to approve it, builders know how to complete it, and developers are willing to return with another project.
Repeat business may be the most honest measurement of whether modular construction really delivered something better.
We Also Need to Talk About the Failures
Our industry is quick to share photographs of successful crane sets but far less willing to discuss factories that close, projects that arrive late or relationships that fall apart. That silence allows outsiders to conclude that the construction method itself failed.
In many cases, the real causes are undercapitalization, poor management, unrealistic schedules, incomplete site work, inappropriate project selection or a factory accepting work it was never equipped to produce profitably.
We should be studying those failures instead of hiding them. Every failed project contains lessons that could help the next developer, factory or builder avoid the same mistakes.
Credibility does not come from pretending everything works perfectly. It comes from honestly explaining what happened, accepting responsibility, and showing what will be done differently.
If We Must Have a Motto
If the industry insists on developing a central message, I would avoid declaring modular to be the future of construction. We have called it the future for so long that people have every right to ask when that future is finally going to arrive.
I would build the message around the one advantage that truly separates modular construction from most conventional building: control.
Better buildings begin with a better-controlled process.
That statement still needs support from real projects, verified results, and customers willing to say they would choose modular construction again. Without that evidence, it would become just another pleasant-sounding phrase.
Gary’s Observation
Modular construction will not grow because we finally discover the perfect motto or produce an award-winning commercial. It will grow when more owners and developers complete successful projects, share verifiable results and return to build with us again.
For more than three decades, we have been trying to change what people think about modular construction. Maybe it is time to concentrate on changing what they experience.
When we consistently deliver proof, we will not have to work as hard to get the message across. Our customers will deliver it for us.
No comments:
Post a Comment