What If We Had a VP of Failure Prediction?


Maybe the smartest hire is the one who sees trouble coming.


The Job Nobody’s Posting

Factories are hiring for production managers, quality control leads, schedulers, and software specialists. Everyone is focused on doing things faster, cheaper, and with fewer mistakes.

But almost nobody is hiring the one person whose job is to ask, “What happens when this doesn’t go as planned?”

Not after the fact.
Before the decision is made.

From Post-Mortems to Pre-Mortems

The offsite industry has become very good at explaining failure—after it happens.

We hold meetings, review timelines, and talk through what went wrong with production, delivery, or installation. The lessons are documented, shared, and then slowly fade as the next project ramps up.

What we don’t do nearly enough is stop before a decision and run the same exercise in reverse.

What could go wrong with this new process?
Where does this schedule break down?
How does this pricing model fail under pressure?

A VP of Failure Prediction would live in that space.

The Most Expensive Sentence in the Factory

“We didn’t think that would happen.”

That sentence has cost more factories more money than almost anything else in the business. It shows up in missed delivery dates, blown budgets, warranty callbacks, and strained relationships with builders and developers.

And it’s almost never said because people weren’t smart enough.

It’s said because nobody was assigned the responsibility to think that way.

A Role Built to Challenge Assumptions

The VP of Failure Prediction wouldn’t be there to slow things down for the sake of it. The role would exist to challenge assumptions just enough to expose the hidden risks.

When a new software system is introduced, they’re not impressed by the demo—they’re asking what happens when it crashes on a Friday afternoon. When a production shortcut is proposed, they’re not focused on the time savings—they’re looking at what it might cost six months later in the field.

They’re not negative.

They’re early.

Why Nobody Wants This Job

Because it’s uncomfortable.

It requires questioning decisions that others are excited about. It means sitting in meetings where momentum is building and asking the one question that brings everything to a pause. It also means occasionally telling leadership that the plan they’re confident in has holes in it.

That’s not a role most organizations reward.

At least not until something goes wrong.

The Hidden ROI

Factories spend a lot of time trying to squeeze out another point of margin through pricing, purchasing, or production efficiency.

But one poorly thought-out decision—a rushed contract, a flawed process change, a system that doesn’t integrate—can quietly erase all of those gains.

Preventing just one of those mistakes can pay for this role for years.

The problem is, you only see the value after the mistake doesn’t happen.

The Person You Already Have

Most factories already have someone who naturally thinks this way.

They’re the one who asks too many questions, points out the downside, and isn’t easily impressed by new ideas. They’re often seen as cautious, sometimes even difficult, because they don’t move at the same speed as everyone else.

And they’re rarely the first person invited into the room when big decisions are made.

A Slight Shift in Thinking

Maybe the industry doesn’t need another title or another executive.

But it might need to take the role seriously enough to give it a seat at the table. To make failure prediction part of the decision-making process instead of something discussed after the damage is done.

Because in a business where margins are tight and schedules are tighter, the cost of being wrong shows up quickly.

Modcoach Observation

modcoach@gmail.com

Factories don’t usually fail because of one big, obvious mistake.

They fail because nobody slowed things down long enough to see the small ones coming.

No comments:

Post a Comment