The Word That Kills Momentum
In its most common form, this word shows up wearing sensible shoes and carrying a clipboard. It sounds responsible. Experienced. Protective. It often arrives with crossed arms and a long memory.
“We like the idea… but”
“We tried something like that before… but”
“That works in Europe… but”
“Our factory isn’t set up for that… but”
When used this way, the word acts like a verbal period disguised as a comma. The conversation technically continues, but the outcome is already decided. Exploration ends. Curiosity shuts down. Risk gets labeled as recklessness. And the idea—sometimes a very good one—never gets a fair fight.
Over time, organizations that rely on this version of the word develop predictable habits:
They confuse past failure with permanent impossibility.
They mistake caution for wisdom.
They reward people who protect the status quo rather than challenge it.
In offsite construction, this can be fatal. Our industry doesn’t move fast enough to afford habitual hesitation. Factories don’t fail because they lack ideas; they fail because too many ideas die early deaths in meetings where nobody is willing to say, “Let’s see what happens if we keep going.”
This is how innovation quietly starves.
The Word That Becomes an Excuse
There’s another destructive version of this word, and it’s even more dangerous because it sounds personal and reasonable.
“I would have pushed harder… but”
“We were going to invest… but”
“The timing wasn’t right… but”
This is where accountability dissolves. The word becomes a soft cushion for missed opportunities and hard conversations that never happened. It allows leaders to explain failure without examining decisions. It lets teams feel justified without being challenged. And it turns hindsight into comfort rather than clarity.
Factories that lean on this version don’t just stall—they drift. They stay busy, not effective. They attend conferences, subscribe to software, and talk about change without ever committing to it. Eventually, they wake up one day wondering why competitors passed them by.
The answer is almost always hiding in that one familiar pause in their language.
The Same Word—Used the Right Way
Now here’s the twist.
That exact same word—same spelling, same sound—can be one of the most powerful tools in offsite construction when it’s used with discipline and intent.
The difference isn’t the word.
It’s what comes after it.
When the word introduces curiosity instead of closure, everything changes.
“We see the risk… but let’s figure out how to manage it.”
“This won’t be easy… but that’s why it’s worth exploring.”
“The numbers don’t work yet… but what has to change to make them work?”
In this form, the word becomes a hinge instead of a wall. It doesn’t end the conversation—it deepens it. It acknowledges reality without surrendering to it. It respects experience while still leaving room for progress.
This is where strong factories separate themselves from struggling ones.
Where Leaders Get It Right—or Wrong
Great offsite leaders don’t eliminate this word from their vocabulary. They train themselves to listen for it.
They notice when it’s being used to avoid responsibility.
They interrupt when it’s being used to shut people down.
They encourage it when it’s followed by a constructive question.
In the best factories, you’ll hear sentences like:
“That idea has flaws… and let’s list them.”
“We don’t have the staff today… and what would staffing need to look like tomorrow?”
“This challenges how we’ve always done things… and that might be the point.”
That’s not optimism. That’s operational maturity.
The Cultural Signal Nobody Talks About
Language sets culture faster than mission statements ever will. When employees learn that ideas die after a certain word is spoken, they stop offering ideas. When managers learn that hesitation is rewarded more than initiative, they stop leading. When innovation becomes something that only happens “someday,” factories slowly lose relevance.
On the other hand, when teams know that objections are welcome—but only if they’re followed by solutions—something remarkable happens:
People prepare better.
Meetings get sharper.
Ideas improve instead of disappearing.
That’s how innovation survives long enough to matter.
A Challenge for Our Industry
Offsite construction doesn’t need fewer ideas. It needs better conversations around them.
The next time you’re in a meeting, listen closely.
Not for what’s being proposed—but for what stops the proposal in its tracks.
Ask yourself:
Is this word being used as a shield… or a lever?
Is it protecting the company… or protecting comfort?
Is it ending the discussion… or pushing it to a higher level?
One small word. Two radically different outcomes.
Used carelessly, it has helped bury more factories, ideas, and careers than any market downturn ever could.
Used intentionally, it might be the single most productive word our industry has—because it forces us to confront reality without surrendering to it.
And in offsite construction, that balance is where real progress begins.
Gary Fleisher—known throughout the industry as The Modcoach—has been immersed in offsite and modular construction for over three decades. Beyond writing, he advises companies across the offsite ecosystem, offering practical marketing insight and strategic guidance grounded in real-world factory, builder, and market experience.
Comments
Post a Comment