Affordable Housing: Are We Just Talking in Circles?

 


Over the past decade, I’ve listened to a steady stream of people step forward with new ideas, new systems, and new promises to finally make housing affordable. Every conference, every convention, every magazine article, every podcast seems to showcase “the solution.” But after all the noise—have any of these efforts made a real foothold in delivering more than a token amount of real-life housing?

The federal government is now trying to step in, streamlining zoning, codes, and a host of other roadblocks that they believe stand in the way. On paper, it sounds good. In practice, it’s another layer of promises that may or may not deliver. Industry spokespeople keep repeating their lines about faster, cheaper, more efficient ways to build—but where’s the proof? Where are the neighborhoods full of truly affordable homes?

What’s Driving the Crisis—Costs or Stagnant Wages?

Part of the challenge is untangling what’s really happening. Is it that the cost of building new homes has skyrocketed, making it impossible to bring them to market at an affordable price? Or is it that household earnings have remained stagnant while home prices keep climbing? The truth is likely a mix of both—and neither side is showing signs of easing anytime soon.

A Losing Battle for Most People

For the average family, the affordability gap keeps widening. Too often, the only “affordable housing” being built is affordable in name only—units that look good on a press release but do little to dent the larger crisis. And while developers, lenders, and policymakers continue to debate what “affordable” even means, millions of people are left out of the market entirely.

Do We Need to Rethink the Definition?

Here’s a thought that may ruffle feathers: what if we simply raised the affordability benchmark? For decades, the standard has been that housing should cost no more than 30% of annual income. But maybe that ship has sailed. What if the new threshold became 40% or even 45%? Wouldn’t that satisfy both mortgage companies and government officials, giving them cover to declare progress and move on to the next big issue on their agenda?

It’s not the solution anyone wants, but at the rate we’re going, it might be the only way many people will ever own a home again.

The Hard Truth

Until someone proves that their “new way” can actually produce homes at scale—affordable homes that people can live in, not just admire in a prototype village—the battle will continue to feel like a losing one. The talk is endless, the promises keep coming, but the results are still too thin.

And the longer this cycle continues, the more likely “affordable housing” will remain little more than a talking point.

Comments